Matthews v. Cameron et al
| Thomas Harvey Matthews |
| Cameron and Attorney General of PA |
| 3:2012cv01759 |
| September 4, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Pike |
| JV |
| Richard P. Conaboy |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER denying motion for reconsideration 42 . (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 11/29/18. (ki)
|
|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Pursuant to the above discussion, Petitioner has not established entitlement to equitable tolling and despite his entitlement to statutory tolling for the pendency of his initial PCRA action his &# 167; 2254 petition was clearly filed after the expiration of the § 2244(d) limitations period. Consequently, this matter is clearly time barred and is precluded from consideration. An appropriate Order will enter. Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 6/19/18. (cc)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)However, in order to keep this matter moving forward, within thirty (30) days of the termination of Petitioners state court proceedings regarding any pending unexhausted federal claim, he will be r equired to file a written status report with the Court detailing the conclusion of his state court exhaustion efforts and including a copy of the relevant Superior and/or Supreme Courts dispositions. Failure to timely file the required written statu s report may be deemed a failure to prosecute. Upon demonstration by Petitioner that his state court proceedings have concluded with respect to his pending unexhausted claims, the stay issued in this matter will be lifted, until such time this matte r will be marked closed for administrative purposes. In the alternative, if Petitioner wishes to proceed solely with his exhausted claims and with the understanding that by doing so he may simply file an amended § 2254 petition within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order containing those claims which have been exhausted in state court. Matthews is again warned that if he chooses to do so he risks being forever barred from presenting in federal court any claim not pr esented in his amended petition, Upon the timely filing of such an amended petition, this matter will be reopened. An appropriate Order will enter. re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Thomas Harvey Matthews Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 5/21/14. (cc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
