Wall v. Bushman et al
| Mitchell Wall |
| Brian Bushman, J. Potope, Neylon and other unknown defendants |
| 3:2012cv02112 |
| October 23, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Union |
| Malachy E. Mannion |
| Edwin M. Kosik |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 2/27/15. (ao)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; adopting 53 Report and Recommendations.; granting 20 Motion to Dismiss Defendants Neylon and Potope; denying 20 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendant Buschman. Defendant Buschman is directed to file an answer to Plaintiff's Complaint on the Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claims within twenty(20) days of the date of this Order. The above-captioned action is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 3/31/14. (ga)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING 53 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS & REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick; ORDER is denying 40 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 40 Motion for TRO. Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 11/19/2013. (bg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
