SIMMS v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
| David L. Simms |
| PA Department of Corrections, SCI Waymart, John E. Wetzel, Wayne J Gavin, L. White, David Chapel and Ronda Ellett |
| 3:2012cv02276 |
| November 15, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Outside State |
| JV |
| Richard P. Conaboy |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Conditions) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM In conclusion, the Plaintiffs failure to respond to this Courts December 6, 2012 Order is deemed a failure to prosecute and his action is hereby dismissed, with prejudice. An appropriate Order will enterSigned by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 1/7/13. (cc)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AND NOW, THEREFORE, THIS 5th DAY OF December, 2012, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:1.Plaintiffs in forma pauperis motion is construed as a motion to proceed without full prepayment of f ees and costs and the motion is GRANTED.2. Within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff may file and serve an amended complaint which is in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(e).3.Failure of Plaintiff to timely submit a proper Amended Complaint or otherwise respond to this Order will result in dismissal of his action for failure to prosecute. Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 12/5/12. (cc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
