Reap v. Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund

Plaintiff: Michael J. Reap
Defendant: Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund
Case Number: 3:2013cv00217
Filed: January 29, 2013
Court: Pennsylvania Middle District Court
Office: Scranton Office
County: Lackawanna
Presiding Judge: James M. Munley
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 29, 2014 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), -GRANTING dft's motion for summary judgment; Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 1/29/14. (sm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reap v. Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael J. Reap
Represented By: Richardson Todd Eagen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?