Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Sepulveda et al
| Commonwealth of Pennsylvania |
| Manuel Sepulveda and The Defenders Association of Philadelphia |
| 3:2013cv00511 |
| February 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Monroe |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 36 MOTION for Reconsideration re 35 Order (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), Order Dismissing Case, filed by The Defenders Association of Philadelphia Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 10/25/13. (jam)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry): IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)The Commonwealths Motion to Remand (Doc. 9) is GRANTED.(2)The Proceedings Before the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County, Pa. to Determine Propriety of Stat e Court Representation by Defender Association of Philadelphia are REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County, Pennsylvania. (3)The Defender Association of Philadelphias Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) is DENIED as moot.(4)The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 8/16/13. (jam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
