LEPRE v. LUKUS et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 15, 2014
ORDER 1. Plaintiffs Objections (Doc. 128, Doc. 129) are OVERRULED. 2. The Report &Recommendation (Doc. 127) is ADOPTED. 3. The Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants Paul Lukus, Forest City Police Department, and Susquehanna County Defendants (Doc. 1 06, Doc. 107, Doc. 122) are GRANTED. 4. To the extent Plaintiffs Procedural and Substantive Due Process claims, Equal Protection claim, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Conspiracy claim, and direct constitutional challenge to 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4341 (b) are not barred for the reasons set forth inthe Report &Recommendation (the Rooker-Feldman doctrine or the absence of Monel/liability), they are DISMISSED for failure to state aclaim upon which relief can be granted. 5. Plaintiff is NOT granted leave to amend further.6. Plaintiff is on NOTICE that the Court is considering dismissing the two remaining defendants, Desiree Shifler-Ferraro and Christine Lukus for the reasons articulated in the attached Memorandum Opinion. a. ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 15, 2014, Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE why these defendants should not be dismissed. \Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 1/15/14. (jfg)
|March 26, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION resolving all pending motions. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 3/26/13. (mwm) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 3/27/2013.]
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?