Reyes v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Plaintiff: Jose Reyes
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Erika Fenstermaker
Mediator: Mediator
Case Number: 3:2013cv00974
Filed: April 16, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: A. Richard Caputo
Presiding Judge: Martin C. Carlson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Conditions)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION (Order to follow as separate docket entry) - Having found that Reyes has not shown grounds to reconsider our prior ruling, and having found: (1) that this limitations period prescribed by the Federal Tort ClaimsAct applies here, a nd bars this claim; and (2) further concluding that Reyes still has not presented legal or factual grounds justifying equitable tolling of the statute of limitations, this motion to reconsider will be denied and this action will remain dismissed as time-barred. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on August 22, 2014. (kjn)
May 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OPINION (Order to follow as separate docket entry) - Finding that this limitations period prescribed by the Federal Tort Claims Act applies here, and bars this claim, and further concluding that Reyes has not presentedlegal or factual grounds justifying equitable tolling of the statute of limitations, this action will be dismissed as time-barred. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on May 20, 2014. (kjn)
March 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)The Report & Recommendation (Doc. 24) is ADOPTED.(2)Plaintiffs claim against the individual Defendant Erika Fenstermaker is DISMISSED with prejudice.(2)Plaintiffs claims proceed solely against the United States and solely under the Federal Tort Claims Act.(3)This matter is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Carlson.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 3/14/14. (jam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reyes v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Reyes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Erika Fenstermaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Mediator: Mediator
Represented By: Joseph Anthony Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?