Morningwake v. Wetzel et al
| Dwayne Morningwake |
| Michael Harlow, John Wetzel and PA State Attorney General |
| 3:2013cv01668 |
| June 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Erie |
| Martin C. Carlson |
| William J. Nealon |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the petitioners unopposedmotion to stay (Doc. 4.) is GRANTED and this case is STAYED pending furtherorder of the Court. We further note that, prior to he appointment of counsel in this case, the petit ioner had filed a pro se motion seeking leave to file a second habeas petition. (Doc. 2.) We doubt that such leave is necessary since the motion may be based on the erroneous premise that a state PCRA petition equates with a federal habeas petition. However, in any event, given the subsequent appointment of counsel for the petitioner, this motion will be deemed WITHDRAWN and dismissed without prejudice to renewal by counsel if counsel deems it necessary. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT within 30 days of the termination of the petitioners related state-court PCRA proceedings, the petitioner shall file a written status report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on July 12, 2013. (kjn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
