Piazza v. County of Luzerne et al
Plaintiff: Leonard C. Piazza, III
Defendant: County of Luzerne and Robert Lawton
Case Number: 3:2013cv01755
Filed: June 25, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Luzerne
Presiding Judge: Richard P. Conaboy
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Honorable Robert D. Mariani for all further proceedings. Honorable Richard P. Conaboy no longer assigned to caseSigned by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 01/24/17. (ep)
January 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)For the reasons discussed above, Defendants Luzerne County and Robert Lawtons Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 58) is DENIED. An appropriate Order is filed simultaneously with this Memorandum. Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 1/23/17. (cc)
October 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) For the reasons discussed above, Plaintiffs Motion for Discovery of Defendants Attorney-Client Communications Based on Waiver of the Attorney-Client Privilege (Doc. 39) is granted to the extent th e communications relied upon by Defendant Lawton in deciding to terminate Plaintiff are not shielded from discovery by the attorney-client privilege. It is also granted to the extent the discovery deadline is extended for a period of sixty (60) days following the date of this Order. (See Doc. 39 at 4.) Plaintiffs motion is denied to the extent he seeks to be allowed to explore all attorney client communications with any witness. (See Doc. 39 at 4.) An appropriate Order is filed simultaneously with this Memorandum.re 39 MOTION to Compel Discovery Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 10/30/15. (cc)
February 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)For the reasons discussed above, Defendants Luzerne County and Robert Lawtons Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 15) is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted only as to Plaintiffs Wrongfu l Termination claims in Counts V and VI in the First Amended Complaint. All other claims in Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint go forward. An appropriate Order is filed simultaneously with this Memorandum. Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 2/3/14. (cc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Piazza v. County of Luzerne et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leonard C. Piazza, III
Represented By: Kimberly D. Borland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Luzerne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Lawton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?