KIMMEL v. PONTIAKOWSKI et al
| DIANE KIMMEL |
| Schneider National Carriers Inc. and ZBIGNIEW PONTIAKOWSKI |
| 3:2013cv02229 |
| August 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Outside State |
| James M. Munley |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)GRANTING in part/DENYING in part dfts' motions in limine 61 63 65 67 . ****SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS***Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 11/9/14. (sm)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER 49 DENYING MOTION for Summary Judgment (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 10/16/14. (sm)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry),GRANTING 42 MOTION for Extension of Time to to file a motion for summary judgment. Dft is directed to refile motion w/i 14 days of this order; Pretrial Conference scheduled for 9/17/14 is cancelled.Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 8/12/14. (sm)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), DENYING WITHOUT prejudice 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Schneider National Carriers Inc., ZBIGNIEW PONTIAKOWSKI.Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 06/26/14. (sm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
