Davis v. Saylor et al
Plaintiff: |
Willie Davis |
Defendant: |
Sherman, Saylor and Parter |
Case Number: |
3:2013cv02279 |
Filed: |
August 30, 2013 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Office: |
Scranton Office |
County: |
Union |
Presiding Judge: |
Martin C. Carlson |
Presiding Judge: |
Robert D. Mariani |
Nature of Suit: |
Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
April 14, 2014 |
Filing
31
ORDER upon de novo review of Magistrate Judge Carlson's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24); Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 14); Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 21), which is in substance a Brief in Opposition; and all related filings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24) is ADOPTED, for the reasons stated therein, namely: a. That it is undisputed that Plaintiff did not exhaust his admi nistrative remedies, (see Comp!., Doc. 1, at 2); b. That Plaintiff has not put forward alegally-recognized explanation for his failure to exhaust; and c. That further discovery could not alleviate this procedural barrier to continuing the litigation. 2. Plaintiffs Objections (Doc. 25) are OVERRULED, because: a. The legal arguments made therein are not supported by applicable law; and b. There is no plausible basis to accept Plaintiffs conclusory argument that the U.S. Attorney's Office' ;s representation of the Government Defendants was unauthorized by federal law.3. Defendant's Motion for Summary (Doc. 14) is GRANTED. 4. Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 21) is DENIED. 5. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the case. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 4/14/14 (jfg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?