Damiano v. Scranton School District et al
Gwen Damiano |
Scranton School District, Robert Sheridan, Robert Lesh, Lynn Ruane, Nathan Barrett, Armand Martinelli and Cy Douaihy |
3:2013cv02635 |
October 25, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Scranton Office |
Lackawanna |
Malachy E Mannion |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 131 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry),(1)the District defendants motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 94), is GRANTED;(2)defendant Bolands motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 110), is GRANTED; and(3)the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. ORDER TERMINATING CASESigned by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 9/19/16. (bs) |
Filing 129 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)that the motion to strike is granted in part and denied in part. (See document for details).Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 6/13/16. (bs) |
Filing 81 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) motions to dismiss 51, 54 Granted in Part and Denied in Part. (See order for details). Finally, defendants will be directed to file their answers to the remaining claims of plaintiffs second amended complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 9/30/15. (bs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.