Moore v. Air Methods, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: Robert W. Moore
Defendant: Air Methods, Inc. and PHPA OPEIU Local 109
Case Number: 3:2014cv00684
Filed: April 8, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Carbon
Presiding Judge: Robert D. Mariani
Nature of Suit: Railway Labor Act
Cause of Action: 45:151
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER upon consideration of Defendant Air Methods' Motion for Sanctions (Doc. 33), joined by Defendant PHPA OPEIU Local 109 (Doc. 43), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant's motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; to wit:a. Defenda nt's motion is granted to the extent that it seeks adetermination that Plaintiffs counsel violated Rule 11 by proceeding against Air Methods and Local 109 without a factual basis for doing so in light of the applicable statute of limitations and facts indicating when Plaintiffs cause of action accrued. The sanction that is imposed is a public declaration of a Rule 11 violation. b. Defendant's motion is denied in all other respects. 2. Because summary judgment has previously been entered in favor of the Defendants (Doc. 45), the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 7/29/15. (jfg)
July 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 45 JUDGMENT be and is hereby entered in favor of Air Methods, Inc. & PHPA OPEIU Local 109 and against Plaintiff Robert W. Moore. (Memorandum previously filed)Upon consideration of Defendant PHPA OPEIU Local 109's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 25) and Defendant Air Methods' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 30), and all accompanying briefs and exhibits, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:1.Defendant PHPA OPEIU Local109's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 25) is GRANTED. Judgment is hereb y accordingly entered IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT Local 109 and AGAINST PLAINTIFF Robert Moore.2.Defendant Air Method's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 30) is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby accordingly entered IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT Air Methods and AGAINST PLAINTIFF Robert Moore. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 7/10/2015. (bg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Air Methods, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert W. Moore
Represented By: Donald P. Russo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Air Methods, Inc.
Represented By: Raymond M Deeny
Represented By: James C. Oschal
Represented By: Patrick Richard Scully
Represented By: Jonathon M Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PHPA OPEIU Local 109
Represented By: Claudia Davidson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?