DeVaugh v. United States Department of Justice et al
Richard DeVaugh |
Gubbiotti, Pikulski, United States Department of Justice, Trently and Hugar |
3:2014cv01833 |
September 22, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Scranton Office |
Wayne |
JV |
Richard P. Conaboy |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)The Department of Justice is not a properly named Defendant. Second, DeVaughs present allegations clearly challenge the validity of the duration of his ongoing confinement and as such are more app ropriate for federal habeas corpus review and not properly asserted in a civil rights action. See Thibodeau v. Watts, 2006 WL 89213 *2 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2006). Third, Plaintiffs requests for compensatory and punitive damages are premature under He ck. Since Plaintiffs civil rights complaint is "based on an indisputably meritless legal theory," it will be dismissed, without prejudice, as legally frivolous. Wilson, 878 F.2d at 774. Plaintiff, if he so chooses, may reassert his present claims in a properly filed § 2241 action. An appropriate Order will enter.Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 10/20/14. (cc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.