Graham-Smith et al v. Wilkes-Barre Police Department et al
| Delilah A. Graham-Smith and Rodney G. Smith |
| Wilkes-Barre Police Department, City of Wilkes-Barre, Alan Gribble and Gerard E. Dessoye |
| 3:2014cv02159 |
| November 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Luzerne |
| James M. Munley |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), GRANTING 34 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Alan Gribble, and City of Wilkes-Barre ; Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendants and CLOSE this case.Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 4/18/17. (sm)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM- GRANTED re Dfts Wilkes Barre Police Department and Chief Gerard Dessoye; and GRANTED re Offi cer Alan Gribble in his official capacity; Pltf's 5th and 14th amendment claim of Count I are dismissed; Pltf's negligent infliciton of emotion distress of Count 8 is dismissed; and Pltf's loss of consortium claim of Count 11 is dismissed- The motion is DENIED in all other aspects and the defendants are ordered to answer w/i 14 days of this order. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 5/19/15. (sm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
