Altenbach v. Link et al
Plaintiff: Gregory Altenbach
Defendant: Dave Link, Tammy Ferguson and Dave Smead
Case Number: 3:2014cv02431
Filed: December 23, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Centre
Presiding Judge: CA
Presiding Judge: Robert D. Mariani
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER granting 94 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Any appeal from this order is DEEMED frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 11/29/17 (jam)
February 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 86 MEMORANDUM The Court finds that granting Plaintiff leave to amend would not result in prejudice to any of the Defendants. Consequently, Plaintiffs request for leave to file asecond amended complaint will be granted. A separate order will issue.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 2/13/17. (jfg)
January 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER 1. The parties shall confer in good faith regarding all outstanding discovery issues within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. 2.Within ten (10) days following the conclusion of the parties' conference, each party shall file asepa rate status report with the Court adhering to the standards set forth in the Court's Memorandum of this date. 3. The motion (Doc. 22) to compel discovery filed on April 13, 2015 is DENIED as premature.4. The motions (Docs. 31,37,49) to compel di scovery filed on September 24, 2015, October 13, 2015 and November 9,2015 are DENIED without prejudice.5. The motion (Doc. 34) for extension of time to continue discovery is DENIED without prejudice. 6. The motion (Doc. 43) for oral argument to resolve discovery disputes is DENIED without prejudice. 7. The petition for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum (Doc. 42) is DENIED without prejudice.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 1/15/16. (jfg)
October 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER THAT the motion to appoint counsel, (Doc. 17), is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 10/15/15. (jfg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Altenbach v. Link et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Altenbach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dave Link
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tammy Ferguson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dave Smead
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?