TABANSI v. WOLFF et al
| Sehu Kessa-Saa Tabansi |
| Tom Wolff and John Wetzel |
| 3:2015cv00676 |
| April 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Outside State |
| LQ |
| Edwin M. Kosik |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER: (1) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson dated August 28, 2015 (Doc. 25 ) is ADOPTED; (2) Plaintiffs requests to proceed in forma pauperis (Docs. 4 and 16 ) are DENIED; and, Plaintiffs Motion regarding immine nt danger of serious bodily physical harm (Doc. 11 ) is DENIED; (3) The Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). Additionally, the Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and, (4) The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case and to FORWARD a copy of this Order to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 9/23/2015. (emksec, )
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM ORDER - Since there is pending a recommendation to dismiss this lawsuit entirely, Pews requests are premature. Therefore, these motions (Docs. 26 and 27 .), are DENIED, without prejudice to renewal of these motions following the district courts resolution of the pending Report and Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on September 11, 2015. (kjn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
