Rinker et al v. Amori et al
| Thomas Rinker and Michelle Rinker |
| Scott Amori, Amori & Associates, LLC, James Marsh and John Does 1-10 |
| 3:2015cv01293 |
| June 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Monroe |
| Malachy E Mannion |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), ORDER TERMINATING CASE Amori defts' mot. for sumjgm. is Granted; mot. of deft. Marsh for sumjgm is Granted. Pltf. req. for leave to conduct suppl. discovery is Denied. Clerk to closed case.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 11/22/16. (bs)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), Michelle Rinker (individ. & as H/W) terminated. Amori defendants motion to dismiss, (Doc. 43), is DENIED with respect to plaintiff Thomas Rinkers claims against them in Counts I and I I of the SAC, (Doc. 40), and these claims against Amori defendants will PROCEED.Amori defendants and defendant Marsh are directed to file their answers to the remaining claims against them in plaintiff Thomas Rinkers SAC on or before April 8, 2016. (See document for further rulings and details.)Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 3/22/16. (bs) Modified on 3/22/2016 (bs).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
