Siggelow v. Colvin

Siggelow v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Amy Marie Siggelow
Defendant:	Carolyn W Colvin
Case Number:	3:2015cv01308
Filed:	July 1, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Scranton Office
County:	Luzerne
Presiding Judge:	Richard P. Conaboy
Nature of Suit:	Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 22, 2016	Filing 30 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Plaintiffs counsels request for a fee award pursuant to the EAJA will be granted subject to the aforementioned reductions totaling $276.00. The Court finds that Plaintiffs counsel is entitled to an EAJA award in the amount of $6,839.47. An Order to this effect will be issued contemporaneously with this Memorandum.Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 7/22/16. (cc)
March 3, 2016	Filing 21 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)The Court determines that the Commissioners denial of benefits in this case is unsupported by the requisite substantial evidence. See Dobrowolsky and Cotter, supra. Accordingly, this matter will be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings to address the errors referenced in this Memorandum. An Order consistent with this determination will be filed contemporaneously. Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 3/2/16. (cc)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 22, 2016

Filing 30 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Plaintiffs counsels request for a fee award pursuant to the EAJA will be granted subject to the aforementioned reductions totaling $276.00. The Court finds that Plaintiffs counsel is entitled to an EAJA award in the amount of $6,839.47. An Order to this effect will be issued contemporaneously with this Memorandum.Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 7/22/16. (cc)

March 3, 2016

Filing 21 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)The Court determines that the Commissioners denial of benefits in this case is unsupported by the requisite substantial evidence. See Dobrowolsky and Cotter, supra. Accordingly, this matter will be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings to address the errors referenced in this Memorandum. An Order consistent with this determination will be filed contemporaneously. Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 3/2/16. (cc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Siggelow v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Marie Siggelow
Represented By:	John A. Bednarz, Jr.
Represented By:	F. Michael Friedman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?