Mulero v. Walsh et al
| Bernie Mulero |
| Patrick James Walsh, Ronald Sheposh, Gary Gifford, Department of General Services and State Capital Police |
| 3:2015cv01406 |
| July 21, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Monroe |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). (1) Defendant Sheposhs Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, Motion for a New Trial, and Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment (Doc. 77) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: (a) Defendants Motion as a Matter of Law on qualified immunity is DENIED;(b) Defendants Motion for a New Trial is DENIED;(c) Defendants Motion for remittitur is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Plaintiff SHALL REMIT $125,000 of the compen satory damage award. Should the Plaintiff refuse to accept $125,000 in compensatory damages, a new trial on the issue of compensatory damages SHALL be conducted.(2) Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs (Doc. 74) will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:(a) Plaintiff is awarded $148,772.50 in fees for services rendered byAttorney Harry Coleman, Attorney John Lawler, and Paralegal LeighGerardi. Plaintiff will be awarded an additional $1,467 for costs.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 2/28/18. (dw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
