Nunez et al v. Wolf et al
| Fernando Nunez and Jenny Nunez |
| Tom W Wolf, John E. Wetzel, James A. Eckard, Jane Doe and Tabb Bickell |
| 3:2015cv01573 |
| August 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Huntingdon |
| PT |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiffs motion to compel, (Doc. 81 ), and a motion to determine sufficiency of responses to requests for admissions. (Doc. 74 ) are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on March 7, 2022. (kjn)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) denying 56 MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by Fernando Nunez. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 12/11/2020. (ve)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). Motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. 35) is Granted in part and Denied in part. Mr. Nunez's motion to join addional parties (Docs.3& 45) are DENIED. (See Order for complete details).Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 11/13/20. (ga)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel 11 is DENIED without prejudice.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 10/18/18. (dw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
