Lockett v. Smith et al
Tramale Lockett |
Delker, Woods, Kimberly, Dawn, Larry, Michelle, Luzier and Richard C Smith |
3:2015cv01843 |
September 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Scranton Office |
Centre |
LQ |
Edwin M. Kosik |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), ORDER DISMISSING CASE 1.This action is DISMISSED under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute. 2.The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.3.Any appeal from this order will be deemed frivolous, without probable cause and not taken in good faith.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 6/12/17. (bs) |
Filing 27 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 25 and 26 ; granting in part and denying in part 19 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying as moot 22 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; and, dismissing Defendants Warden Smith and Nurse Larry. Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 2/23/2016. (emksec, ) |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM ORDER denyting 17 MOTION to Amend filed by Tramale Lockett. The plaintiff is directed to prepare a comprehensive proposed amended complaint, and submit this proposed amended complaint, along with amotion to amend in the form called for by Local Rule 15.1, and a brief in support of this motion, on or before, December 10, 2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on November 19, 2015. (kjn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.