Butler v. United States of America
| Stacy Butler |
| United States of America and Rodwan K. Rajjoub |
| 3:2015cv02395 |
| December 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Union |
| CA |
| Robert D. Mariani |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER 1. The motion (Doc. 36) to dismiss is GRANTED. a. All claims against Radwan K. Rajjoub are DISMISSED. b. The Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE Rodwan K. Rajoub as a party to this action. 2. The motion (Doc. 35) for joinder is DENIED. 3. P laintiff is granted 28 days from the date of this Order to file aSecond Amended Complaint in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20. Failure to timely file aSecond Amended Complaint may result in the dismissal of Plaintiffs action.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 2/7/17. (jfg)
|
|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 2/1/17. (ep)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 06/13/16. (ep)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER 1. Plaintiffs motion, (Doc. 13), for leave to file an amended complaint is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiffs proposed amended complaint is accepted. This case will proceed on the amended complaint as filed. (Doc. 13-1).Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 1/13/16. (jfg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
