Edwards v. Wetzel et al
| Jack Edwards |
| John Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson, Becker Bachic, Matthew McCoy, Marcia Noles, Tabb Brickell, Debra Rand and Shawn Kephart |
| 3:2016cv00045 |
| January 12, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Centre |
| JV |
| Richard P. Conaboy |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) Based on the present circumstances, granting the request for dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute is warranted. However, dismissal will be entered without prejudice. In the event that Edwards provides this Court with his current address within a reasonable time period, this determination will be reconsidered. An appropriate Order will enter.Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 7/3/18. (cc)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry). A decision as to whether this Court should exercise jurisdiction over the surviving state law tort claims against the three Remaining Defendants will be held in abeyance pending submission of a response to the First Amendment claim. An appropriate Order will enter. re 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 2/6/17. (cc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
