Zavec v. Collins et al
| Dawn Zavec |
| Robert Collins, Brian Gist and City of Wilkes Barre |
| 3:2016cv00347 |
| February 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Luzerne |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 38) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:(A) Plaintiffs ADA claim relating to Mr. Zavec is DISMISSED with prejudice.(B) The Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in all other respects.Defendants shall file answers to Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint within 21 days from the date of entry of this Order.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 2/23/18. (dw)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). (a) Counts I and II are DISMISSED with prejudice. (b) Count III as it relates to Plaintiff, Joseph Zav ec's claim only, is DISMISSED with prejudice. (c) Count V is DISMISSED with prejudice. (d) Count VI is DISMISSED without prejudice. (e) Count VII properly states a claim, and as such, Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to this count. SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 7/27/2017 (arcsec, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
