UGI Sunbury LLC v A Permanent Easement
| UGI Sunbury LLC |
| A Permanent Easement, Ralph C. Moerschbacher, Russella L. Moerschbacher and All Unknown Owners |
| 3:2016cv00789 |
| May 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Snyder |
| Edwin M. Kosik |
| Land Condemnation |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 717 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to exclude 54 is denied; Defendant's motion to exclude 58 is denied; Defendant's motion to exclude 60 is denied; resolution of Defendant's motion to apply state law 56 is stayed. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/24/18. (lg)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER (MEMORANDUM filed previously as separate docket entry) - Plaintiff's 15 MOTION for Hearing is DENIED. Plaintiff's 13 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff's 11 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall post a surety bond w/the Clerk of Court in the amount of $465.50 payable to "Clerk, U.S. District Court" and sent to the U.S. Courthouse & Federal Bldg., Williamsport. The surety bond will be held in the vault located in the Clerk's Office - MDPA - Williamsport Division. (See Order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/2/2016. (km)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
