Dillow-Lopez v. Colvin

Dillow-Lopez v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Kelly J. Dillow-Lopez
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	3:2016cv01442
Filed:	July 12, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Scranton Office
County:	Luzerne
Presiding Judge:	Edwin M. Kosik
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 10, 2017	Filing 28 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). The Commissioners Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, (Doc. 22), is DENIED.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 10/10/17. (bs)
March 21, 2017	Filing 21 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), (1) Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Kelly J. Dillow-Lopez and against Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security as to Plaintiffs Social Security Disability Insur ance Benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) claims under Title II and Title XVI; (2) The decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security denying Kelly J. Dillow-Lopezs DIB and SSI claims is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to th e Commissioner of Social Security to conduct a new administrative hearing, fully develop the record, and appropriately evaluate the evidence; and(3) The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE the case.ORDER REMANDING CASE.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 3/21/17. (bs)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 10, 2017

Filing 28 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). The Commissioners Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, (Doc. 22), is DENIED.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 10/10/17. (bs)

March 21, 2017

Filing 21 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), (1) Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Kelly J. Dillow-Lopez and against Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security as to Plaintiffs Social Security Disability Insur ance Benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) claims under Title II and Title XVI; (2) The decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security denying Kelly J. Dillow-Lopezs DIB and SSI claims is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to th e Commissioner of Social Security to conduct a new administrative hearing, fully develop the record, and appropriately evaluate the evidence; and(3) The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE the case.ORDER REMANDING CASE.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 3/21/17. (bs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dillow-Lopez v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelly J. Dillow-Lopez
Represented By:	Thomas D. Sutton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?