Lawson v. Norwood et al
Ronnie Lawson |
Northeast Regional Office/U.S.P. - Lewisburg, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Department of Justice |
3:2016cv01489 |
July 18, 2016 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Scranton Office |
Union |
CA |
Robert D. Mariani |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER 1. Defendants' motion (Doc. 18) to dismiss is GRANTED. 2. The complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this action. 4. Any appeal from this Order is DEEMED frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 12/20/16. (jfg) |
Filing 9 ORDER 1. The motion (Doc. 2) to proceed in forma pauperis is construed as amotion to proceed without full prepayment of fees and costs and is GRANTED.2. Plaintiff shall FILE an amended complaint on or before August 29,2016.3. The amended complaint sh all contain the same case number that is presentlyassigned to this action, 3:16-cv-1489, and shall be direct, concise, and shallstand alone without reference to any other document filed in this matter. SeeFED. R. CIV. P. 8(d). 4. Failure to timely file an amended complaint will result in dismissal of this action without further notice of Court.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 8/8/16. (jfg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.