Hutton v. Lowe et al
Orville M. Hutton |
Craig Lowe, Thomas Decker, Thomas W. Hussey, Sarah Suldana, Jeh Johnson and Loretta Lynch |
3:2016cv01584 |
August 2, 2016 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Scranton Office |
Pike |
CA |
Robert D. Mariani |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is GRANTED in part to the extent that Petitioner will be afforded an individualized bond hearing. 2.An Immigration Judge shall afford Petitioner an individualized bond hearing within fourteen ( 14) days of the date of this Order. 3. At the bond hearing, the Immigration Judge must make an individualized inquiry into whether detention is still necessary to fulfill the purposes of ensuring that the Petitioner attends removal proceedings and th at his release will not pose a danger to the community. Chavez-Alvarez v. Warden York Cnty. Prison, 783 F.3d 469.475 (3d Cir. 2015). At this hearing. the Government bears the burden of presenting evidence and proving that continued detention is neces sary to fulfill the purposes of the detention statute. Diop v. ICE/Homeland Sec., 656 F.3d 221,233 (3d Cir. 2011). 4. Within ten (10) days of the Immigration Judge's hearing, Respondent shall report to the District Court on the outcome of the individualized bond hearing. 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 5/11/17. (jfg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.