Irvin v. Colvin

Irvin v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	John Irvin
Defendant:	Carolyn W Colvin
Case Number:	3:2016cv02007
Filed:	October 3, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Scranton Office
County:	Cumberland
Presiding Judge:	Richard P. Conaboy
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 6, 2017	Filing 22 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)As the Court has noted (Page 20, ante), the record documents hand complaints that could be expected to limit Plaintiffs ability to finger, feel, handle, and grasp. The Court has also found that th e record is not adequately developed to intelligently quantify the limiting effects of Plaintiffs various hand afflictions. Thus, Plaintiffs allegations regarding the limiting effects of his hand symptomology must be credited unless the Agency can p oint to something in the existing record which this Court has been unable to find that reasonably discredits Plaintiff on this issue. In the alternative, as suggested earlier, it is likely necessary to expand this record to determine whether all Plaintiffs impairments, along with their cumulative effect, have been adequately accounted for by the ALJs RFC determination.Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 7/6/17. (cc)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 6, 2017

Filing 22 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)As the Court has noted (Page 20, ante), the record documents hand complaints that could be expected to limit Plaintiffs ability to finger, feel, handle, and grasp. The Court has also found that th e record is not adequately developed to intelligently quantify the limiting effects of Plaintiffs various hand afflictions. Thus, Plaintiffs allegations regarding the limiting effects of his hand symptomology must be credited unless the Agency can p oint to something in the existing record which this Court has been unable to find that reasonably discredits Plaintiff on this issue. In the alternative, as suggested earlier, it is likely necessary to expand this record to determine whether all Plaintiffs impairments, along with their cumulative effect, have been adequately accounted for by the ALJs RFC determination.Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 7/6/17. (cc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Irvin v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Irvin
Represented By:	Stephen J. Hogg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?