Ildefonso-Candelario v. Lowe et al
| Roman Ildefonso-Candelario |
| Craig A. Lowe, Thomas R. Decker, Thomas S. Winkowski, Jeh Johnson and Loretta Lynch |
| 3:2016cv02120 |
| October 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Pike |
| Malachy E Mannion |
| Joseph F. Saporito |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)(1)Petitioner Ildefonso-Candelarios motion for attorneys fees under the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. §2412(d)(1)(A), (Doc. 22), is GRANTED; and(2)petitioners counsel, Daniel Conklin, is awarded attorneys fees in the amount $8,137.50.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 9/28/17. (bs)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), (1)The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr., (Doc. 17), is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY;(2)The petitioners habeas petition, (Doc. 1), is GRANTED IN PART to the extent that it seek an individualized bond hearing;(3)An individualized bond hearing shall be conducted by an immigration judge within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order in accordance with Judge Saporitos recommendations; (SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS).ORDER TERMINATING CASESigned by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 4/28/17. (bs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
