Primerica Life Insurance Company v. Coleman et al
Primerica Life Insurance Company |
Christopher G. Coleman and Joshua J. Coleman |
Joshua J. Coleman |
Christopher G. Coleman |
Joshua J. Coleman |
Primerica Life Insurance Company |
3:2016cv02429 |
December 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Scranton Office |
Wayne |
Robert D. Mariani |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment; SEE ORDER FOR ALL INFO; Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 11/16/17 CC: FINANCIAL (ep) |
Filing 25 OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as modified. For reasons set forth, Defendant Joshua Coleman is directed to re-file a motion for summary judgment in compliance with Local Rules, o/i/t/a a motion for default judgment on the cros sclaim against Deft. Christopher Coleman with 7 days. For the reasons set forth, Primerica's motion for summary judgment as to its interpleader relief (Doc. 19) is GRANTED, subject to compliance as below. Primerica's motion to dismiss the counterclaim is GRANTED. Primerica is hereby directed to deposit $88,100.00, plus accrued interest to the date of deposit into the Court Registry. Primerica's motion for default judgment against Deft. Christopher Coleman is DENIED AS MOOT. See Opinion and Order for additional details. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 10/20/17. (jam) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.