Paden et al v. Wagner et al
Andre L. Paden, Sandford Williams, Jr. and James Williams |
James Wagner, Austin Anglemyer, Catherine T. Pirolli, Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and James P. Gregor |
3:2016cv02565 |
December 30, 2016 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Scranton Office |
Monroe |
Robert D. Mariani |
Karoline Mehalchick |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 157 ORDER adopting 153 Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 125 Motion for Summary Judgment. The matter is REMANDED to Magistrate Judge Mehalchick for the purpose of determining whether the parties will consent to her jurisdiction for trial. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 9/21/20. (jam) |
Filing 119 ORDER ADOPTING 111 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff Sanford Williams' 91 MOTION to file an amended complaint is DENIED. The matter is remanded to Magistrate Judge Mehalchick for further proceedings.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 9/25/19. (jam) |
Filing 118 ORDER adopting 105 Report and Recommendations. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case as to Plaintiff Andre L. Paden. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 9/3/19. (jam) |
Filing 36 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; ORDER REMANDING CASE; adopting 24 Report and Recommendations. ***SEE ORDER FOR ALL INFO***Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/1/17. (ep) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.