McCoy v. Baltazar
Petitioner: Reggie L. McCoy
Respondent: J. Baltazar
Case Number: 3:2017cv00693
Filed: April 18, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: PT
Presiding Judge: A. Richard Caputo
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). (1) The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. (2) The Motion to Transfer Case 12 is DENIED as moot. (3) The Motion to Reopen Case 14 is DENIED as moot. (4) The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 10/18/18. (dw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCoy v. Baltazar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Reggie L. McCoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: J. Baltazar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?