Minter v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Morris Minter
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 3:2017cv00763
Filed: April 28, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Robert D. Mariani
Presiding Judge: Karoline Mehalchick
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING 16 Report and Recommendations. The Commissioner's decision is VACATED. The case is REMANDED to an Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings consistent with this Order and the Report & Recommendation. Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/27/18. (jam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Minter v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Morris Minter
Represented By: Katherine L. Niven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?