NELSON v. ACRE MORTGAGE & FINANCIAL, INC. et al
| BRIGITTE NELSON |
| ACRE MORTGAGE & FINANCIAL, INC. and CLASSIC QUALITY HOMES |
| 3:2017cv01050 |
| June 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Outside State |
| Robert D. Mariani |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
237
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) Signed by Chief MJ Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 4/19/24. (ms)(Copy to Financial and H. Snell from Chambers)
|
|
Filing
147
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 131 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability FOR AN INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL filed by Brigitte Nelson. The plaintiffs motion for certification of an interlocutory appeal under § 1292(b) will be denied.An appropriate order follows. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 11/15/22. (ms)
|
|
Filing
124
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 70 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ACRE MORTGAGE & FINANCIAL, INC. For the foregoing reasons, defendant Acres motion for summary judgment (Doc. 70) will be granted in part a nd denied in part. The motion is granted with respect to the plaintiffs state-law claims against Acre, but, pursuant to the mandate of the Third Circuit, it is denied with respect to the plaintiffs federal claims under TILA and Regulation Z and under RESPA and Regulation X.Summary judgment will be granted against the plaintiff with respect to her rescission and conspiracy claims against both defendants, as set forth in Counts Five and Six of the amended complaint, and with respect to her aiding and abetting claim against Acre only, as set forth in Count Seven of the amended complaint. The remaining claimsfederal claims against Acre only under TILA and Regulation Z and under RESPA and Regulation X (Count One), a state-law UTPCPL claim agains t Classic only (Count Two), a state-law breach of contract claim against Classic only (Count Three), a state-law fraud in the inducement claim against Classic only (Count Four), and a state-law aiding and abetting claim against Classic only (Count Seven)will be set down for trial.An appropriate order follows. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 9/28/22. (ms)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER denying 103 Motion to Stay Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 1/26/22 (ep)
|
|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 70 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ACRE MORTGAGE & FINANCIAL, INC. For the reasons set forth above, Acre Mortgages motion for summary judgment will be granted in part and d enied in part as moot. It will be granted with respect to the plaintiffs TILA and RESPA claims set forth in Count One of the Amended Complaint. The plaintiffs state-law claims against both defendants will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). As a result, the remainder of Acre Mortgages motion for summary judgment will be denied as moot.An appropriate order follows. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 9/25/20. (ms)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
