Wood v. The Secretary of the Army

Plaintiff: Sean E. Wood
Defendant: The Secretary of the Army
Case Number: 3:2017cv01390
Filed: August 7, 2017
Court: Pennsylvania Middle District Court
Office: Scranton Office
County: Pike
Presiding Judge: Malachy E Mannion
Referring Judge: Susan E. Schwab
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05:551
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 18, 2018 44 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; adopting 42 Report and Recommendations.; granting 16 Motion to Dismiss; denying 16 Motion for Summary Judgment. Clerk to close case.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 7/18/18. (bs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wood v. The Secretary of the Army
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sean E. Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Secretary of the Army
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?