Henry v. Deibelbis et al
| Craig Henry |
| William H Deibelbis, John E. Wetzel, Andrew Daneha, Paul Noel, Christopher Oppman and D. Cutshall |
| 3:2017cv01391 |
| August 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Huntingdon |
| JV |
| Richard P. Conaboy |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 31), ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 3/13/19. (jam)
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)The Plaintiff is also reminded that his amended complaint must be complete in all respects. It must be a new pleading which stands by itself without reference to the original complaint. The amend ed complaint should clearly identify each Defendant, set forth the factual substance underlying Henry's claims in short, concise and legible statements, and specify the constitutional claims and relief being sought. If an amended complaint is n ot timely filed, the claims against the Corrections Defendants will be dismissed for the reasons set forth herein and disposition of the surviving portion of the original complaint may proceed. An appropriate Order will enter. Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 6/10/18. (cc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
