Fahey v. Berryhill

Plaintiff: Jude Fahey
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 3:2017cv01399
Filed: August 9, 2017
Court: Pennsylvania Middle District Court
Office: Scranton Office
County: Luzerne
Referring Judge: Susan E. Schwab
Presiding Judge: William J. Nealon
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 16, 2018 14 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT - Judgment be & is hereby ENTERED in favor of deft Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security & against pltf Jude Fahey, as follows: The decision of the Commissioner denying Fahey's app for disability ins benefits & supp'l security income is AFFIRMED, in acc w/ ct's order 13 . (See jdgmt for complete details.)Signed by Deputy Clerk on 5/16/18. (ki)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fahey v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jude Fahey
Represented By: Joshua Borer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?