Fought v. City of Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania et al
| Joshua Fought |
| City of Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, Tony George, Marcella Lendacky and Joseph Homza |
| 3:2017cv01825 |
| October 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Columbia |
| Robert D. Mariani |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 41) is DENIED except as stated in paragraph 2 for the reasons set out in the simul taneously filed Memorandum Opinion.Defendants Motion is GRANTED AS MODIFIED insofar as Count XI (42 U.S.C. § 1983 Custom and Policy) and Count XII (Negligent Hiring) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file an amende d complaint addressing the deficiencies found in the claims dismissed without prejudice and incorporating all claims as to which the Court denied Defendants motion.Should Plaintiffs choose to file an amended complaint, they shall do so on or before June 26, 2020.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/12/20 (jam)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 19 Motion to Stay ; Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 11/14/017 (ep)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
