Healthpro Therapy Services, LLC v. Ridgeview Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center LLC et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Middle District Healthpro Therapy Services, LLC v. Ridgeview Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center LLC et al

Healthpro Therapy Services, LLC v. Ridgeview Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center LLC et al

Plaintiff:	Healthpro Therapy Services, LLC
Defendant:	Ridgeview Operations LLC
Case Number:	3:2017cv01959
Filed:	October 26, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Scranton Office
County:	Berks
Presiding Judge:	Malachy E Mannion
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 15, 2021	Filing 96 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1) Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff as to Count I of the amended complaint for breach of contract and as to Defendants breach of contract counterclaim in the amount of $368,020.30, plus Plaintiffs attorneys fees and costs. 2) Plaintiffs unjust enrichment claim, which was plead in the alternative as Count II in the amended complaint, is DISMISSED AS MOOT. 3) The court defers ruling on the to tal amount of damages owed by Defendant pending review of the parties submissions on Plaintiffs attorneys fees and costs. 4) Within seven days of this order, Plaintiff shall file documentation of its attorneys fees and costs. Defendant shall have seven days to file any opposition thereto, and Plaintiff, thereafter, shall have seven days to file a reply. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 3/15/2021. (ve)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 15, 2021

Filing 96 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1) Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff as to Count I of the amended complaint for breach of contract and as to Defendants breach of contract counterclaim in the amount of $368,020.30, plus Plaintiffs attorneys fees and costs. 2) Plaintiffs unjust enrichment claim, which was plead in the alternative as Count II in the amended complaint, is DISMISSED AS MOOT. 3) The court defers ruling on the to tal amount of damages owed by Defendant pending review of the parties submissions on Plaintiffs attorneys fees and costs. 4) Within seven days of this order, Plaintiff shall file documentation of its attorneys fees and costs. Defendant shall have seven days to file any opposition thereto, and Plaintiff, thereafter, shall have seven days to file a reply. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 3/15/2021. (ve)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Healthpro Therapy Services, LLC v. Ridgeview Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center LLC et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Healthpro Therapy Services, LLC
Represented By:	Devin J. Chwastyk
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Ridgeview Operations LLC
Represented By:	Nicholas H. Pennington
Represented By:	Stacey A. Scrivani
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?