Patel v. Dhaduk

Patel v. Dhaduk

Plaintiff:	Mukeshkumar B. Patel
Defendant:	Vithalbhai D. Dhaduk
Case Number:	3:2017cv02243
Filed:	December 6, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Scranton Office
County:	Lackawanna
Presiding Judge:	A. Richard Caputo
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 2, 2019	Filing 68 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). (1) The Motion for Summary Judgment 39 filed by Plaintiff, Mukeshkumar B. Patel is GRANTED.(2) JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff, Mukeshkumar B. Patel and againstDefendant, Vitha lbhai D. Dhaduk, on Count I of the Amended Complaint.(3) JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Patel and against Dhaduk in the amount of$9.45 million. (4) The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 12/2/19. (dw)
September 5, 2019	Filing 42 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). (1) The Motion to Dismiss Defendants Counterclaims 29 is GRANTED. (2) Defendants Counterclaims I, II, III, and IV are DISMISSED with prejudice. (3) Defendants Counterclaim V for tortious interference is DISMISSED without prejudice to Defendant filing an amended answer with affirmative defenses and counterclaims within twenty-one (21) days from the entry of this Order to plead a plausible tortious interference claim. (4) Failure to timely file an amended answer with affirmative defenses and counterclaims will result in the dismissal of the tortious interference claim with prejudice.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 9/5/19. (dw)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 2, 2019

Filing 68 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). (1) The Motion for Summary Judgment 39 filed by Plaintiff, Mukeshkumar B. Patel is GRANTED.(2) JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff, Mukeshkumar B. Patel and againstDefendant, Vitha lbhai D. Dhaduk, on Count I of the Amended Complaint.(3) JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Patel and against Dhaduk in the amount of$9.45 million. (4) The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 12/2/19. (dw)

September 5, 2019

Filing 42 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). (1) The Motion to Dismiss Defendants Counterclaims 29 is GRANTED. (2) Defendants Counterclaims I, II, III, and IV are DISMISSED with prejudice. (3) Defendants Counterclaim V for tortious interference is DISMISSED without prejudice to Defendant filing an amended answer with affirmative defenses and counterclaims within twenty-one (21) days from the entry of this Order to plead a plausible tortious interference claim. (4) Failure to timely file an amended answer with affirmative defenses and counterclaims will result in the dismissal of the tortious interference claim with prejudice.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 9/5/19. (dw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patel v. Dhaduk
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mukeshkumar B. Patel
Represented By:	CASEY B GREEN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Vithalbhai D. Dhaduk
Represented By:	Roger J. Harrington, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?