Scopelliti v. Traditional Home Health and Hospice
Plaintiff: Dina Scopelliti
Defendant: Traditional Home Health and Hospice
Case Number: 3:2018cv00040
Filed: January 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Lackawanna
Presiding Judge: A. Richard Caputo
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 158 CLERK'S JUDGMENT on Plaintiff's retaliation claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act, in favor of Defendant, Traditional Home Health and Hospice, and against Plaintiff, Dina Scopelliti.Entered on 11/22/21. (jam)
September 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 125 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1.Defendants Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiff from Introducing Statements Allegedly made by Co-Workers Regarding her Separation from Employment and/or Workplace Discrimination (Doc. 91) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUD ICE. 2.Defendants Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiffs Claim for Back Pay Damages (Doc. 93) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3.Defendants Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiffs Claim for Punitive Damages (Doc. 95) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PAR T as follows:a.Plaintiff is precluded from recovering punitive damages for her claims of retaliation under the ADA/ADAAA and FMLA.b.Defendants motion is denied in all other respects. 4.Defendants Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiffs Claim for Emot ional Distress Damages (Doc. 97) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:a.Plaintiff is precluded from recovering emotional distress damages for her claims of retaliation under the ADA/ADAAA and FMLA.b.Defendants motion is denied in all othe r respects.5.Defendants Motion in Limine to Preclude Testimony of Plaintiffs Treating Physicians (Doc. 99) is GRANTED as follows: Plaintiffs treating physicians, having been offered by Plaintiff as lay witnesses, and not as experts, will be limited to testimony regarding their diagnosis and treatment of Plaintiff and will not be permitted to offer expert opinions as to the cause of her injuries or her prognosis. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 9/24/21 (jam)
June 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER adopting 63 Report and Recommendations.; adopting 70 Report and Recommendations.; denying 23 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 29 Motion for Summary Judgment.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/2/20 (jam)
April 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). Defendant Traditional Home Health and Hospice's Motion to Dismiss 10 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART: (a) Count I of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. (b) Counts II and III of the Amended Complaint shall not be dismissed. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 4/20/18. (dw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scopelliti v. Traditional Home Health and Hospice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dina Scopelliti
Represented By: Cynthia L. Pollick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Traditional Home Health and Hospice
Represented By: Harry T. Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?