Moody v. Wetzel et al
Plaintiff: Brandon Moody
Defendant: John Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal, Michael Wenerowicz and Tabb Bickell
Case Number: 3:2018cv00053
Filed: January 8, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Luzerne
Presiding Judge: EBC
Presiding Judge: James M. Munley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 175 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) Defendant's motion 147 is GRANTED. Defendants expert psychiatrist, Dr. Pogos Voskanian, may perform a comprehensive mental health evaluation of Plaintiff, consistent with Federal Rul e of Civil Procedure 35; the examination of Plaintiff shall occur at a date and time agreeable to the prison administration at the State Correctional Institution, Phoenix, Pennsylvania (or other such correctional facility where Plaintiff may be confi ned), Dr. Voskanian, and Plaintiff; The examination will be conducted via a face-to-face interview through Zoom with oral questions, will be premised upon the complaint in this civil action, will be conducted within the usual scope of medical practice, and will have the purpose of assessing the inmates overall mental health functioning and needs. Signed by Honorable Robert D Mariani on 01/17/2024. (cac)
August 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 165 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 129 MOTION to Compel filed by Brandon Moody Signed by Honorable Robert D Mariani on 8/16/23. (sm)
July 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 160 ORDER denying 135 Motion to Amend/Correct ; The stay of the dispositive motion (Doc. 138 ) shall remain in effect pending resolution of the discovery-related issues in this matter; Signed by Honorable Robert D Mariani on 7/19/23 (ep)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moody v. Wetzel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandon Moody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Wetzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shirley Moore-Smeal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Wenerowicz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tabb Bickell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?