Mendez v. McDonalds Resturant

Mendez v. McDonalds Resturant

Plaintiff:	RITA MENDEZ
Defendant:	MCDONALDS RESTURANT
Case Number:	3:2018cv00391
Filed:	February 15, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Scranton Office
County:	Outside State
Presiding Judge:	William I. Arbuckle
Presiding Judge:	Malachy E Mannion
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 9, 2019	Filing 12 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS The report and recommendation of Judge Arbuckle, (Doc. 10), is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY.(2)The plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED without further leave to amend pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41.(3)The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE.; adopting 10 Report and Recommendations.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 4/9/18. (bs)
December 10, 2018	Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ;(1)The report and recommendation of Judge Arbuckle, (Doc. 4), is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY.(2)The plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis, (Doc. 1), is GRANTED.(3)The plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED W ITHOUT PREJUDICE.(4)The plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before January 2, 2019.(5)The instant action is REMANDED to Judge Arbuckle for consideration of the plaintiffs amended complaint and for any necessary pre-trial matters. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle; Amended Pleadings due by 1/2/2019.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 12/10/18. (bs)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 9, 2019

Filing 12 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS The report and recommendation of Judge Arbuckle, (Doc. 10), is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY.(2)The plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED without further leave to amend pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41.(3)The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE.; adopting 10 Report and Recommendations.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 4/9/18. (bs)

December 10, 2018

Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ;(1)The report and recommendation of Judge Arbuckle, (Doc. 4), is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY.(2)The plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis, (Doc. 1), is GRANTED.(3)The plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED W ITHOUT PREJUDICE.(4)The plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before January 2, 2019.(5)The instant action is REMANDED to Judge Arbuckle for consideration of the plaintiffs amended complaint and for any necessary pre-trial matters. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle; Amended Pleadings due by 1/2/2019.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 12/10/18. (bs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mendez v. McDonalds Resturant
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: RITA MENDEZ
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MCDONALDS RESTURANT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?