Frantz v. Nationwide Insurance Company et al
| David Frantz |
| Nationwide Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company and Nationwide Insurance |
| 3:2018cv00509 |
| March 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Monroe |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 39 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Nationwide Insurance Company, Nationwide Insurance, Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 5/19/21. (ms)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). 11 GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Bad Faith Claim (Count III) against Nationwide Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Fire Ins. Co. and Nationwide Ins. in the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Motion is DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 9/4/18. (dw)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) 2 Defendants Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiffs have twenty-one (21) days from the date of entry of this Order to file an amended complaint; otherwise,their claims will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 5/15/18. (dw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
