Brought v. Berryhill

Plaintiff: Ashley Brought
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 3:2018cv00788
Filed: April 11, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Juniata
Presiding Judge: Martin C. Carlson
Presiding Judge: James M. Munley
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) ADOPTING the 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Carlson; overruling the objections; Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendant and CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 6/13/19. (sm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brought v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Brought
Represented By: CHRISTOPHER J. MARZZACCO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?