Scartelli Construction Services, Inc. v. Chesapeake Building Components, Inc.
Plaintiff: Scartelli Construction Services, Inc.
Defendant: Chesapeake Building Components, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2018cv01164
Filed: June 7, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Lackawanna
Presiding Judge: Richard P. Conaboy
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 90 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 89 Request filed by Chesapeake Building Components, Inc., 75 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Chesapeake Building Components, Inc. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 8/9/2021. (ve)
May 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 51 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Because this Court cannot determine whether the Magisterial Court action regarding the Dickson City Project was sufficiently similar to this action to justify invocation of the doctrine of res judi cata, because the jurisdictional threshold governing civil actions in a Pennsylvania Magisterial Court would have prevented the instant action from being heard there, and because our review of the record persuades this Court that Judge Conaboy determ ined correctly that events related to the Dickson City Project were irrelevant to this action for all purposes, Plaintiffs Motion to Strike (Doc. 46) will be granted. An Order consistent with this determination will be filed contemporaneously. re 46 First MOTION to Strike 43 Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 5/21/19. (cc)
February 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). 34 MOTION to Strike Declarations of Ralph Scartelli, John L. Ludwig, and Lawrence M. Ludwig, Esquire filed by Chesapeake Building Components, Inc. is DENIED.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 2/5/19. (dw)
January 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). 1. Defendant Chesapeakes Motion to Change Venue 21 is denied; and 2. Defendant Chesapeakes Motion to Dismiss, or, in the alternative, for a More Definite Statement 17 is granted to the extent that Count IV Promissory Estoppel of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint is dismissed; said motion is denied in all other respects.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 1/23/19. (dw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scartelli Construction Services, Inc. v. Chesapeake Building Components, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scartelli Construction Services, Inc.
Represented By: Lawrence M. Ludwig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chesapeake Building Components, Inc.
Represented By: Robert N. Gawlas, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?