The United States of America v. The Unknown Heirs of Shirley Ames et al
| The United States of America |
| Justin Lozenski, Jentry Reese, Jerrid Lozenski, James Lozenski, The Unknown Heirs of Shirley Ames, Thomas Reese and Krystyna Koroneos |
| 3:2018cv01563 |
| August 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Richard P Conaboy |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1471 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to James Lozenski, Jerrid Lozenski, Justin Lozenski, Jentry Reese, Thomas Reese, The Unknown Heirs of Shirley Ames and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James Lozenski, Jerrid Lozenski, Justin Lozenski, Jentry Reese, Thomas Reese, The Unknown Heirs of Shirley Ames, filed by The United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s))(ao) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
