Vishnefski v. Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: David Vishnefski
Defendant: Rehrig Pacific Company and Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2018cv01887
Filed: September 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Robert D Mariani
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2018 Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc.. (Wynn, Matthew)
October 15, 2018 Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Rehrig Pacific Company,identifying Corporate Parent Rehrig Pacific Holdings, Inc. for Rehrig Pacific Company. (Wynn, Matthew) Modified on 10/15/2018 (ep).
October 15, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew S. Wynn on behalf of All Defendants (Wynn, Matthew)
October 2, 2018 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by David Vishnefski. Rehrig Pacific Company waiver sent on 9/26/2018, answer due 11/26/2018; Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc. waiver sent on 9/26/2018, answer due 11/26/2018. (Karpf, Ari)
October 1, 2018 Filing 4 LETTER ORDER Re: Case Assignment and Procedures. You are directed to file a written report within 30 days as to whether service has been effected or a waiver of service obtained. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 10/1/18. (jam)
September 26, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy S Seiler on behalf of David Vishnefski (Seiler, Timothy)
September 26, 2018 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Rehrig Pacific Company, Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc. and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (lh)
September 26, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rehrig Pacific Company, Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc. ( Filing fee $400, Receipt Number 0314-4552935), filed by David Vishnefski. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vishnefski v. Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Vishnefski
Represented By: Timothy S Seiler
Represented By: Ari R. Karpf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rehrig Pacific Company
Represented By: Matthew S. Wynn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew S. Wynn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?